20 January 2015

Re: Sandy Easdale's shareholding

Firstly, we'll apologize for being slow on content and podcasts lately. The holidays take it out of all of us.

Now to the business:

Despite headlines popping up from Jack Irvine's emails being regurgitated, Sandy Easdale's shareholding (via proxy, etc) has decreased from 26.15% to 26.123%, as per the LSE.

You will soon be bombarded with blogs and stories trying to paint him as the sole knight riding in to save Rangers; he is a (prior) convicted felon who can't even sit on the PLC board and whose desperate grasp on everything we hold dear is weakening.

Typically when you swap the deck chairs on a sinking ship you do so to make yourself look better. In Sandy's case, and despite the best PR money can buy, he's even fucked this one.

Back the people trying to save the Club, not those trying to save their seats in the Directors' Box.

New podcast coming for you on Wednesday. We'll resume normal programming accordingly.



  1. hypocrite, why not talk about Dave King convicted felon?

  2. Dave King was never convicted, so was never a felon either. You also have to remember that those investigators are now under investigation for their methods.

    If Sandy Easedale really cared about Rangers, and has nothing to hide from the fans, he'd do as Paul Murray has done. He'd join the RST and Rangers First, then proxy his votes to them.

    It seems he's prepared to go down on the wrong side of history, and be consigned as a mere footnote.


Keep it civil, lads.