30 July 2015

Chris McLaughlin called to task by RST over match delegate report

by Shane Nicholson | Executive Editor

One of the sideline highlights of Rangers' 6-2 bashing of Hibs at the weekend was the BBC's Chris McLaughlin shooting his mouth off about info he'd received from match delegate George Douglas, who just happens to be the ex security supremo at Celtic Park.

Fill your boots, Chris!

McLaughlin's final claim of handling this the same as he would any other club is of course laughable. There are two times he has words to report on Rangers: 1) when a supporter does something stupid; and 2) when he reads his emails from Jack Irvine.

In fact, the last time Chris mentioned "arrest" on Twitter in context of football fans was back in July of 2011. You'll never guess what club is was focused on...

All this aside, the obvious question arose as to how Chris could possibly get his hands on the info in the match delegate's report prior to even the SPFL, and what police did he possibly talk with to confirm his information as all subsequent reports had seven fans arrested and zero identification as to what team they support.

Of course McLaughlin, behind a story on the BBC's website with no byline, filed a report typical of his past work:

How oh how was intrepid reporter and wholesale Irvine jockey Chris McLaughlin able to garner such complete information? Inquiring minds would like to know, including now the Rangers Supporters Trust.

The RST has written to the SPFL tonight seeking explanation as to the conduct of its match delegate on the day, including whether it is "common practice for SPFL match delegates to approach journalists and 'offer' them detailed information on the contents of their match report." They go on to ask: "If not can you explain why the match delegate saw fit in this instance to approach the media to highlight one aspect of the contents of his match report?"

Obviously, despite McLaughlin's rather ridiculous arse-covering explanation, it is not the status quo to have match delegates giving briefings before their report has been filed with and reviewed by the SPFL. Poor Chrissy Mac, the hard-working nose-to-the-ground reporter that he claims to be, may have finally gone a step too far.


  1. He should get all the facts but it just does not happen at BBC plus they hate the bears

  2. Lazy, lazy "journalism. But it's all about the Rangers. Blinkered reporting to say the least.
    Will he ever tell the truth about the real cover ups in Scottish football. Course he won't say anything against his beloved club.

  3. I despair at questionable literary thoughts, claiming to be honest impartial reporting of a football match and committed to print as truth ; Evidentialy this MUST be challenged...Surely as thinkers, we are compelled to investigate whether such authors are; Simply incompetent; Or dangerous bigots pushing an agenda of discrediting one club in this case Rangers While ignoring indiscresions acted out by a club say, which he may favour..
    As a consequence deliberate inacurate reporting in the negative for say Rangers and their support, will obviously raise the esteem, the respect held for another Glasgow Institution; Celtic, and their supporter...

    If such innacurate reporting has indeed proved to have happened...... One is compelled to ask; WHY?
    Why attempt to blacken Rangers name
    Why attempt to put a stain on the support.
    In the 21st century everyone should be working together to eliminate bigotry, hatred, supporting known terrorist organizations .. In short, promote anything that eliminates hatred. NOT CREATE THAT WHICH NEVER HAPPENED, ALL FOR A HEADLIGN
    Let's drag our country into the 21st century, and if you cannot get on board, Get Out

  4. I'm glad the RST are all over this, and hope the club will back this up with their own enquiries. It's time that this lit were forced to retreat, because we've all had enough of this. I understand that because he's a BBC journalist, he works for a company that isn't sensitive to commercial pressures, but he has to be taken to task officially on this.

  5. Is anyone surprised though. We are used to this one sided journalism from the bbc. The board of our club should stand up for the fans and investigate these reporters with hidden agendas. WATP

  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

  8. This comment has been removed by the author.

  9. Paranoia alive and well, both sides of the Clyde...!!!!


Keep it civil, lads.